Google
 

Friday, June 19, 2009

Free Abortion Day At Philidelphia Clinic

Having taken the time to educate myself upon some of the uglier, more despicable aspects of our society, I often consider myself beyond being surprised by anything. However, regardless of how much vileness I witness, I still manage to occasionally be surprised. Today was one of those days.

As a tribute to the late Dr. George Tiller (recently murdered physician known for performing late term and partial birth abortions) The Philadelphia's Women's Center gave away free abortions on Tuesday. Any pregnant woman who visited their facility from the time it opened until late afternoon got treated to a complimentary abortion in honor of Dr. Tiller.

Disturbing, horrific....but also very, very fitting. What more appropriate tribute could there be to a man who dedicated much of his medical profession to the aborting of late term babies than to offer up the termination of the unborn for free? Very, very fitting.

Now, I'm not interested in debating pro-life or pro-choice here and regardless of where you stand on Dr. Tiller's abortion practices, ANYONE should find it horrific to see life treated in such a cold and callous fashion. It's a little hard to empathize with the pro-choice arguments about 'poor women, all alone, devastated by the horrific choices they have to make.....' when the Philly clinic is giving abortions away like door prizes to the first lucky customers of the day.

Here's an article on the matter.....hat tip to Elusive Wapiti and his Friday Roundup.

ARTICLE

Don't Call Me Ma'am

I imagine many of us are aware that it's military protocol to address men as "Sir" and women as "ma'am". Even if we weren't aware of such conventions, we still would never consider taking offense of the use of such a formal and respectful manner of address. Not so for Barbara Boxer, Democratic senator for California.





Bear in mind that Ms. Boxer has been cited as being "perhaps the personification of the feminist left" by the Almanac of American Politics.

All I have to say concerning Ms. Boxer's rudeness toward the Brigadier General she was questioning is, "Learn some respect, MA'AM".

Thursday, June 18, 2009

Reproductive Choice and Gender Disparity

Glenn Sacks has a great article in the Huffington Post (of all places). In it, he addresses claims made by Peggy Drexler in her Huffington Post column.....claims that assert, among other things, that

"[Abortion is] gender's judicial flashpoint. If men got pregnant, reproductive choice would be in the Bill of Rights - if not a sacrament. Yet, we were are a vote or two shy of limiting or denying that choice. Women will see that threat as no man possibly can."


Mr. Sacks does an admirable job disproving Ms. Drexler's allegation that, if it were men, the powers that be would be jumping through hoops to guarantee them the right to terminate their pregnancies and shows it for what it is.....another feminist assertion predicated upon mendacities.

Mr. Sacks states,

"Drexler may be correct that Sotomayor will help broaden the Court's perspective and make it more solicitous of women's concerns. Her view that society would be more solicitous of men's reproductive rights than women's is common in the pro-choice movement. However, if men could get pregnant, would abortion really be legal? Based on the relevant family law rulings and related legislation, the answer is probably "no."

Though abortion is controversial, few believe that women should be compelled to bear and be responsible for children who were conceived as a result of a criminal act, such as a sexual assault. Yet numerous courts have ruled that boys must be held responsible for the children they involuntarily fathered in their early teens as a result of a criminal act--statutory rape by an adult woman.

For example, in 2004 a Michigan appeals court ruled that a man who had conceived a child with an adult when he was 14 must pay her child support. Though the court acknowledged that the sex act which produced the child would have been a crime under state law, they decided that the case should be resolved "without regard to the fault of either of the parents."

Most people sympathize with women who have decided to terminate their pregnancies because they conceived as a result of being deceived into believing that their partners had vasectomies or were sterile. By contrast, courts have consistently failed to extend any consideration to men who have been deceived.

For example, in 2005 an Illinois appellate court decided a case in which a Chicago physician alleged that his ex-girlfriend had secretly kept his semen after the two had oral sex, and then impregnated herself with it. The court stated that if the doctor's story is true, his ex-girlfriend "deceitfully engaged in sexual acts which no reasonable person would expect could result in pregnancy." Yet it hung the responsibility for the child on the doctor anyway, employing the pretzel logic that "when plaintiff 'delivered' his sperm, it was a gift...There was no agreement that the original deposit would be returned upon request."

Fetal protection laws also demonstrate courts' and lawmakers' concern for women's reproductive rights and disregard for men's; if mom doesn't want to be a parent, the unborn child is a meaningless fetus, yet if it is dad who doesn't want to be a parent, the fetus is considered a living human being. This double-standard was highlighted in 2005 in a case involving a Texas high school couple.

Erica Basoria testified that when she was four months into her twin pregnancy she regretted not getting an abortion, and asked Gerardo Flores, her boyfriend, to help her terminate it. Basoria then punched herself in the stomach while Flores stepped on her stomach, inducing a miscarriage.

Though both Flores and Basoria had committed exactly the same act for exactly the same reasons, Flores is now serving life in prison for murder. Basoria, who stood by Flores and cried when he was sentenced, could not be prosecuted because of her legal right to an abortion.

A million and a half American women legally walk away from motherhood every year by abortion, adoption, or abandonment. In more than 40 states, a mother can terminate all parental responsibility by returning the baby to the hospital within a few days or weeks of birth. Similarly, women can give their babies up for adoption, generally with few legal complications.

By contrast, courts and laws refuse to recognize reproductive prerogatives for men, forbidding them to avoid responsibility for a pregnancy in even the most extreme circumstances. If men got pregnant, would they have abortion rights? There's little reason to think so."

Article

Well said, Mr. Sacks.



Wednesday, June 17, 2009

Only Women Can Be Abused

A week or so ago, I sank down on the couch and flipped on the T.V. to relax for a minute before finishing up a few work related items on the computer. I surfed through the channels a bit and ended up watching a television show called "Here Come the Newlyweds". It's something of a reality/game show where newlywed couples team up and compete to win a pot of money they've all contributed to week to week by winning various tasks aimed at showing team work, communication, etc.

My dubious choice of viewing material aside.....allow me to relate the following,

Dr. Ruth (psychosexual therapist extraordinaire) was a visitor on the show, there to advise the couples in matters of intimacy and answer any questions they may have. One of the husbands, a Mr. Huffman, knowing Mrs. Huffman was a bit uncomfortable discussing matters of a sexual nature in public, as a joke, pretended his wife wanted to ask a question. Once it had been cleared up that she didn't, the camera showed Mrs. Huffman berating her husband under her breath and telling him that she was going to punch him "in the nuts" later on.

In the couple's rooms, cameras are placed to capture their conversations before going to bed. Clips are shown from all the couple's bedrooms. When it's time to check in on the Huffmans, we see the couple on the bed together and then Mrs. Huffman reaches over and, with closed fist, hits her husband in his genitals. Needless to say, he doubles up, says "Ow"....goes through the normal and expected stages of pain. While he's recovering from the blow, his wife is saying, "I told you! I told you!"....expressing that he knew this was coming and was well deserved for his actions. He,in an obviously hurt and injured tone, said something along the lines of "we're not going to be able to have kids if you keep doing this,".....leaving one to wonder how common this form of retaliation is in their marriage.

Needless to say, I was appalled by his wife's behavior....appalled and disgusted. I was also a bit bothered that Mr. Huffman would sit there and allow himself to be treated in such a fashion. Incidentally, the scene ended with her "kind of" forgiving him and allowing a good night peck.

Now, let's go back and imagine the exact same scenario in reverse. Imagine had Mrs. Huffman played a little joke on her husband and he'd muttered under his breath that when they got back to the room he was going to punch her in her genitals. Imagine that, when they got back to the room, Mr. Huffman did indeed punch his wife in the genitals (all caught on camera, of course), telling her as she cringed in pain "I told you! I told you!"

Would Mr. and Mrs. Huffman still be on their little reality show competing with couples? Or would cops have busted into their room that very night and dragged Mr. Huffman away? Instead of trying to win cute little competitions with his wife, Mr. Huffman would be sitting in a jail cell awaiting trial for domestic violence. His picture would be on every paper and his name on every news station where the clip documenting the unthinkable, horrific abuse of his wife would be played every hour on the hour. The general shock and outrage would be palpable.

Would be.

Had it been Mrs. Huffman who was assaulted thus.

However, it was only Mr. Huffman. So there are no cops, no arrests, no court trials, charges of assault, news headlines or angry feminists using the incident to prove the great and hideous evil that is man. Instead, I imagine the incident will be considered entertaining and amusing and our newlyweds are going forward as if nothing happened, ....after all, according to most, because it happened to Mr. Huffman....nothing did.

Monday, June 8, 2009

The Family Terrorist

Amfortas, Paul Elam and Christian J have been very busy and have produced another outstanding video. I sincerely thank them for their efforts.....not to mention for providing me with something of such great quality to post on my blog when I've been a bit remiss in posting myself. I apologize to everyone for my recent low post count. Hopefully things will settle down a bit and I'll have more time to devote to my blog.

That said....this new video is titled 'The Family Terrorist' (or, 'If Momma Ain't Happy') and takes a look at some ugly truths about behaviors of women within their families; behaviors that are appallingly common, generally excused and even laughed away by society.

One excellent quote within the video by Erin Pizzey concerning mothers who emotionally terrorize their families is,

Through the subtle creation of perpetual turmoil this terrorist may drive other family members to alcoholism to drug addiction, to explosive behavior, to suicide. The other family members therefore are often misperceived as the family problem, and the hidden terrorist seen as the saintly woman who puts up with it.

The Family Terrorist


Wednesday, June 3, 2009

The Wages of Spin

I present for your viewing pleasure a fine collaborative effort from Amfortas, Paul Elam and Christian J. The video succinctly debunks the wage gap myth while shedding light upon the realities of the much touted "glass ceiling".


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rbYU0aeaX1o